Friday

English 102

Life after the Hungarian trip seemed to happen at a faster clip. The tentative confirmation of my English abilities practised on unsuspecting Germans and Magyars, plus no apparent and pressing interest in a future engineering career, started leading me in a different direction. The time was spent in fancying an international career in whatever was more exciting than trying to keep the crumbling Soviet infrastructure together. Reading just about any English book I could get my hands on was way more fun than drooling on some ancient engineering treatises.

At that time, the central bookstore in town started getting shipments of relatively freshly published and glossily packaged western stuff. Most of these valuable bundles were cheap paperbacks. Sometimes a classier material managed to seep through the borders too, as one day I even found a copy of the Bible, the New International Version. This was to be my first exposure to the Holy Writ. Alas, my atheistic background hindered my thinking so I had to stop early into Genesis stumbling by the genealogies, lists and strange names. Why did I start at Genesis? Well, I was sort of used to starting most of the books at page one. Besides, thinking that the New Testament was literally just a newer version of the Old Testament did prompt me to start there. A great pity indeed, since I could have learned about Jesus sooner, as such it was not to be for another couple of years.

I typically ploughed through other books with greater success, although at times negating some more difficult parts – they had to wait since I hardly had time to decipher. One of them was Murder in the Catskills. For the longest time while and after reading the book I puzzled over the bewildering fact of whether the cats were the culprits or cat’s skills served as a useful murder weapon. In either case I was not to discover the truth until some years later when living in New York. After all this was not that important as the murder did take place as well-evidenced by the shrilling bright cover that depicted something resembling a murder weapon and a set of handcuffs – very useful for anybody endeavouring to grow all and any American inclinations…


Abridged Story of Plyush
About this time my best friend Misha and I managed to come across a very intriguing business opportunity. Although it hardly had anything to do with English, it did have a lot to do with another foreign tongue – Czech.

When the majority of our school friends left to serve the glorious motherland in the ranks of the Red Army, many typically ended up in places exhibiting hardly anything inspiring and cuddly. Some ended up in the deep forests of the middle Russia, others in the desolate East Siberian taiga or even amidst the turbulent and frigid waters of the White Sea – a gateway into the Arctic Ocean – brrrr. But we did have a lucky one in our brave ranks – Slava Strelnikov. Aptly renamed Plyush (velvety stuffed toy) for his soft facial expressions and propensity to have a heavier than necessary appearance, he really scored with his military career. They must have really liked his peach fuzz visage, sparing him of tundra and Afghanistan. After all, there were nice warm spots even behind the Iron Curtain.

Following an initial shipment to some obscure Ukrainian locale for boot camp purposes, Plyush was informed that his next port of call was to be a motorized infantry battalion stationed near the beautiful city of Prague. Plyush was delighted. With his trimmer, post boot camp, statute, he was ready for an exemplary stint with the glorious battalion that had distinguished itself on a number of glorious occasions. One such occasion happened back in 1968 when the intrepid battalion had to roll over a few nasty protestors. They thought that waving a few flags and screaming some chants would get them western pensions, trips to Paris and a strange societal force called democracy. No, the battalion really thought otherwise, the heady days of glory distinctly marked by deficits of socks, cheese and underwear were to persist for some time to come.

Fast-forward just about twenty years and a lot had changed. The intoxicating winds of Perestroika were sweeping the guarded Communist world. People were getting ever more optimistic about their economic and political prospects that penetrated even the thick armour of the battalion mentality. No longer every passing day meant anything too technical like polishing tank treads or too fundamental like brushing up on the Communist manifesto. Now everyone was really bent on getting their very personal and very economic needs met first, end of story. It seemed that the great exercise in collective happiness was winding down, giving way to the icy winds of individual success. Icy and yet promising, they were. Plyush, like hardly anyone else in the battalion, felt the need to brace up against the acute elements. And while most of his cohorts did not expect much more than a few scattered memories, some foreign trinkets and lingering taste of Czech beer; Plyush, troubled by his energetic nature, could not simply succumb to such eventuality.

Truth be told, our dear Plyush was a different kind of fellow who frequently did not subscribe to well-established stereotypes. He always stood out, for one reason or another, I never knew for sure. It could have been his upbringing in a tiny one room 16th floor apartment sized at about 400 sq. ft. There, together with his brother of rather rebellious personality, he learned to put up with the inadequacies of Soviet life in just about all of its forms, ranging from the utmost lack of privacy to his father’s propensity for strong alcohol. At times one had to wonder how Plyush managed in school where he persisted in getting sort of high-ish marks. Plyush was clearly smart and sometimes even fearless, calculatingly so. Once upon entering his apartment I was struck by a terrifying and yet surprisingly serene scene of Plyush quietly reading a book while sitting on the thinnest of window sills with nothing but 150 ft. of free fall behind him. I could not do it even with a 15ft. gap between myself and the window but Plyush seemed entirely impervious to the madness of vertigo, Sir Isaac Newton notwithstanding.

After that window episode, I knew that there was something in Plyush that I could not always count on reasoning with. In short, there was something a bit zanily extreme about the dude. None was manifested abler than his prodigious ability to hold liquor and inhale packs of cheap Soviet cigarettes. It typically took at least a couple of us to match his strokes in the partying department otherwise there was no such thing as an even playing field. Plyush was just head and shoulders, or rather liver and lungs, above your average Ivan. And yet a ray of reason was not a stranger in his larger than regular cranium. So just a few days before his first date with the boot camp, Plyush weighed his chances and figured that cigarettes were going to kill him faster than drink. He had to have either but he could not do with none. So he quit, absolutely cold turkey. In one fell swoop he went from two packs to none - from that day on the only chemical fumes he inhaled were those of the Ukrainian industrial landscape. Unfortunately though, his adventurous body required an equal amount of excitement caused by various chemical agents regardless of his wilful decisions. So instead of a decent balance between cigarettes and alcohol, he had to resort to larger amounts of booze to compensate for any nicotine deficiency that befell his turbulent system.

The glorious Red Army could have cured some of it had the task fallen on someone less resistant but our colourful friend was not content to sit in the barracks and let the world go by. After a few sober weeks of relative mental inactivity he was becoming restless. Now in the confines of the battalion, right on the outskirts of the city that boasted a thousand spires, Plyush was devising an angle. It had to be there and he found it on his very first outing into the beautiful Prague. When others marvelled at the Charles Bridge, royal castles and other visually pleasing distractions, Plyush was most enthused by the commercial street activities otherwise known as the black market. Here the places were just teeming with hawkers of glamorous western merchandise in just about any of its forms that could be carried by a human being. What was even more amazing, the police did not seem perturbed one bit by such unbecoming and very non-socialist activities. It could never have been that blatant in the middle of Moscow or Bukhara, but here the free markets reigned unfettered. Plyush saw the opportunities and he could not get them out of his mind back in the dreary barracks. What about some courier assignment, anything to get outside of the heavy red brick walls of the battalion.

His chances did not linger to show up and one day, just few months into his career at the glorious battalion, Plyush was allowed outside on the regular basis. How he got there exactly remains a mystery. However, whatever it was, from that point on he was able to leave the battalion in plain clothes just about any day of the week. The rest was simply a matter of mechanics as well-endowed Plyush took just a few weeks to master some passable Czech and become a fixture on the local black market scene. At first he serviced his less fortunate comrades back at the battalion. With his successes failing to hide, even his senior officers now relied on his ever more fluent Czech and nimble brains to undertake little side commercial undertakings of their own. Within a year, Plyush was running a little smuggling empire with unbelievable results.

While most of our friends were lucky to return from their army stints with a pair of pre-service jeans that still fit. Plyush returned home with two cars. Owning a car in the Soviet Union at that time was a rare privilege usually reserved to well-connected party officials, hard-working chiefs of the industry and few slippery types that managed to get through the cracks of KGB controls. Having two at the ripe age of 21 was unheard of. Plyush was the first truly self-made specimen in our midst, his enviable success was what everyone wanted to emulate.


Czech Visas – Exercise in Thin Air
Misha and I sensed that something had to be wrung out of the perpetually partying Plyush. The time was of the essence as our capitalist Czech marauder was now fighting a war of attrition with all local restaurants. The stakes were high as it either Plyush was going to run out of his liqueur holding capacity or the whole city would just run out of alcohol. Misha and I, the sober lot, did not worry too much about Plyush’s drinking buddies, these were just happy to partake of his expansive largesse and not much more. We did worry about potential losses should Plyush, after losing the all-out war, decide to exercise his free market talents himself. As long as the war ran its course we were safe. The key question was: what services we could provide for our budding super nova. He had a lot of roubles of course, plus his two cars. These were known but there had to be something else up his sleeve. And if his unending partying indulgence was an indicator he would need able agents to do his bidding.

Finally, one morning, reasonably sober Plyush decided to confide in Misha and me. In short he brought back from Prague a whole sheaf of already authorised and stamped Czech visitor invitations. What were these? Well, to any unsuspecting westerner this was a complete mystery but to every aspiring Soviet traveller these pieces of paper were worth their weight in gold at least thrice over. You see, in the west we easily fly, drive, walk and gallop across just about any sovereign border with an infantile innocence. We usually do not need anything but a passport with a reasonably tidy face on it. And even when we need visa to drop on the likes of the cuddly uncle Kim Chen Il or stylish Mr. Putin, it is usually arranged with ease and facility unless we happen to have too close ties with the State of Texas. But forgetting about our drawling neighbours to the South, the world just loves us and our pocket books.

Well, when it came to the poor Soviets of the 1980s, nobody wanted us. We did not have anything but few scrunched up rouble bills that hardly passed for money at home let alone across the border; our appearance was scruffy and our hearts were certainly in the clutches of Leninist propaganda. But these misfortunes were just a small part of the larger problem. After all, the world society at large saw some semblance of humanity in the lesser specimens of the communist race. Consequently, it usually turned a lenient eye and granted visas more often than not.

OK, they could let us in but the bigger conundrum was the one of leaving - a very essential and at times mostly unattainable privilege. No one knows a precise reason. Tempering our envy of the wider world sounds like a good one. There might have been others. But whatever they were, the only way out was either a private invitation or a tour group shtick. And since belonging to a tour group required some kind of a connection, the private invitation was about the only way out for the less endowed. Well not so fast! How, after the decades behind the barbed wire, could one find a friend? That’s where Plyush’s invitation came into play.

This was a true gold mine, the racket was new and in high demand. It seemed that we could charge just about anything. Plyush, still in the midst of his restaurant assault, could not be bothered and let us have 50 of these at 100 roubles a piece, on best efforts basis of course. Otherwise where would we get such a princely sum of 5,000? My father, a doctor, made considerably less in the whole year.

Now all we had to do was dig. The first trick was to fill out the space for each inviting individual. And since we did not have much facility with Czech language or Prague addresses, we had to rely on Plyush who managed to produce a unique array of names and addresses that appeared to permanently reside in his agile mind. He was not just agile; he was creative, looking at the gig as an exercise to invent more distinctly different names and addresses than Rain Man could possibly memorize. Unfortunately, our immediate offering of the fifty pieces of paper was too limited to give any idiot savant a run for his money.

With papers ready, Misha and I plunged into our marketing activities with boundless enthusiasm of the nascent capitalists. We were just like recently weaned puppies enjoying their first real meaty bone, none of those milk drippings. We ruffled through the full rolodex of just about any friend, neighbour and acquaintance. No dusty, however spider web-ridden, corners of our memory banks were left untouched. From start to finish, the operation was turbo-charged, as the travel-starved Soviets did not to have a heart to turn down an official (or nearly so) reason to enjoy the forbidden fruits of the West, Soviet West. We became more adept marketers or liars, if one prefers, as we went on. The sale of these tenuous pieces of paper invariably invoked a barrage of questions relating to the logistics of travel and, of course, to the logistics of profit making. Every sensible card-carrying Commie wanted to experience the elation of easy profits first and foremost. Money was tight and sightseeing had to come second. There was no disposable income to throw around, nothing could be wasted. To address the legitimate concerns we had to invent our own version of “Let’s Go Czech”. This was an especially sparse, communist version, with no restaurants but home-made sandwiches, with hardly any sightseeing but plenty of bazaar tips, with nothing to sleep on but your own version of a sleeping bag.

And since neither of us had a privilege of travelling to the sunny Czech paradise, we made it much up as we went along, with Plyush’s help of course. That is when he was sober and unencumbered by his jolly restaurant friends and sketchy bevies of girlfriends to boot. Sometimes we had to skip school as mornings, about noon, were about the only time to catch up with Plyush degrise’. When successfully snagged, he proved to be a true oracle and a well of information, deep with all sorts of Czech knowledge. He knew just about all right answers to soothe any buyer’s remorse. After attentive listening sessions with our convivial friend, we acquired many a skill through his incisive and yet calm discourse. It would typically go like this.

“Toock, toock” I hopefully rapped at the door of his 16th story apartment safely delivered by a decrepit elevator that was no stranger to victimizing the locals with empty shaft fakes. Calling ahead was useless as Morning Plyush did not like any early disturbances. He simply yanked the cord from the jack if you tried.

Silence. Deafening silence. Suddenly, a ray of hope crept through the door jamb. Shuffling, slow nonagenarian steps. Last two strides have a bit of a fresh jump. My face shines and the lock creaks. A ray of light crosses the landing. The speedily travelling sunlight is aptly chased by something else, something less pleasant – sour hangover fumes that appear to have pitched a permanent tent in the apartment. With barely a moment to adjust, dishevelled straw hair and ruddy pimpled cheeks rudely thrust into my space – Plyush!

“What do you want this early?” ten o’clock should not have qualified as “early” anywhere outside the entertainment world and Plyush in the midst of his restaurant war. Undeterred I proceeded.

“Plyush, what do we tell them about the money?” It was always an issue with inconvertible roubles as the government would never exchange more than a few meals worth.

“Coffee grinders…” Plyush said with a yawn. He was super laconic in his morning moods. Besides the advice made sense as coffee grinders and personal jewellery were the best foreign exchange mediums.

Why coffee grinders? This is a good question. You see, our central planners had a special affinity for grinding coffee even though there was hardly any coffee to grind. While typically stingy offerings of underwear, sausage and cars persistently eluded the Soviet market, grinders were plentiful. Some astute central planner must have predicted the impending overwhelming conversion to coffee drinking – amazingly prescient. While grinders were fast approaching the magic 2 to 1 ratio (two grinders per capita) the underwear supply stubbornly stayed at 1.5 –Kremlin did not expect a strong improvement in the hygiene habits, I guess.

“Plyush, what do we tell them about the hotels?”

“Coffee grinders…”

Plyush, what about the food and entertainment?”

“Canned fish and coffee grinders…”

Great, I think we had all necessary tools for successful tour guiding. Who cares about Fodors’ or Rick Steeves when you have Plyush and coffee grinders!? Finally, the shackles fell hopelessly to the floor and we were free to act in the best modernist traditions. With Plyush’s advice and guidance it was hardly an issue. Armed with a couple of old and slightly crumpled post cards from the a-spired city we breathed forth pure imagination. For the first time in my life I felt like a poet or at least like a book reviewer. Even if for the most utilitarian purposes, I was finally involved in shaping somebody else’s dream. Maybe I am wasting my time by not selling vacation time shares to the unsuspecting public now.

In my increasingly colourful imagination, hearty and cheap meals garnished with the famed Czech beer serenely waited side by side with clean and affordable hotels that inevitably bordered on the most valuable real estate – public markets. The Charles Bridge and royal palaces could wait. Our subjects were typically the most interested in the pursuit of their mercantile ambitions first and foremost. This was not about the best vistas or the most exciting excursions. Those things they could learn elsewhere. “Where can I sell a coffee grinder?” was always the most pressing question, period.

Frequently our prospects marvelled at our grasp of the key details. I fancied myself to have already travelled to the mystic Prague, as we unrolled the mesmerising and irresistible views in front of our prospective clients. Our sales pitch gradually became so smooth that my poetic inclinations felt almost physically satisfying. It was addictive and I was almost ready to do it for free. Alas, we arrived at the end of the joyous ride with the last of Plyush’s creations dutifully distributed to the hungry public. The time had come to find something else to do…

Having earned my father’s annual salary couple of times over in just three months it was the high time to enjoy the winnings. Since my Jewish genes played a predominant role in my otherwise rather uninspiring personality, I ended up depositing most of my earnings into the old staid Soviet savings bank. The rest was going towards the purchase of few necessities that attested to my commercial prowess – a pair of shiny second grade American sneakers was the most prized item. I did not care that these sneakers were not called Nike or Reebok, I did not care that they were most likely made in Thailand despite the Miami Beach label. I just loved the look, which heavily contributed to my new merchant persona of an emerging street capitalist. This, in addition, was complemented by a pair of irresistible striped pants. English seemed to be the only remaining touch that needed some further work.


Chasing the Capitals
After our Czech visa adventure, Misha and I continued indulging in further commercial transactions of various dubiousness. We were OK with money for the fourth-year students. So with it plus extra time to kill before the start of the new school year, I turned to local travel. Prague could wait and besides I could always find out from my past clients. For now, I was going to one just as exciting locale - Moscow. This was still very cheap and easy, no visas or passports. For only 21 roubles ($2 USD) I flew Moscow to enjoy the historic and culture gems at virtually no other costs to speak of – God bless the centrally planned economies!

I enjoyed my first three-day stay immensely. Taking in much faster and ever more chaotic pace of the capital I much indulged in some superb shopping, Soviet style of course. It is probably a better topic for another time as it has hardly anything to do with any foreign language. However, it wouldn’t out of place to mention that if a marathon runner is a better metaphor for North American shopping, a rugby player is definitely more apropos for the Soviet equivalent. Here is the West, all one has to do is count – styles, sizes, colours and ultimately miles. In the USSR, there was not much to count at all as the multitudes rushed the pearly gates of any shopping establishment that dared selling anything of high demand. We all, just like a herd of hypopotatamus in the best rugby traditions, charged towards that luring white ball. Shoulders, ankles, perfectly healthy livers and chests with fast-beating hearts – all were sacrificed on the altar of material deficits.

Once when returning to my friend’s place after one of these battles for a pair of new shiny shoes, I was struck by an ad placard promising a head-to-head contest between the storied Dynamo Moscow and Washington Capitals of the NHL. Such meetings were rare even for Muscovites since the Soviets with a thinner regular season schedule and a perpetual thirst for hard currency played just about all of their NHL campaigns on the other side of the pond. Luckily, the hopefully mild winds of Perestroika schlepped forth its hockey fruit with Capitals willing to play for a rouble paying crowd. I was elated – here was a spectacular chance to see a real professional hockey game with the storied NHL content. This was particularly amazing since my youth was spent in the hockey desert of Ukraine with the most essential education having to come through our old black and white TV. Up to that point I had seen only one other professional hockey game live when on a school break in St. Petersburg. I thoroughly enjoyed the initial experience and this one was not to be missed.

The game was taking place the following week, and in order not to annoy my friends any further by staying one more time so close together, I had to pull up my Rolodex of other contacts. Fortunately, one such contact was just ready and available to play host. So next week I was going to witness some of the best hockey one could ever see – marvellous!

Week later, upon entering the famed Luzhniki Ice Palace I felt a due sense of awe. No surprise here as this was the true hockey shrine. And unlike the NHL where Joe Louis Arena competed with Madison Square Garden and Chicago Stadium, Luzhniki’s supremacy in Europe was absolutely indisputable. This was where the epic 1972 series was played. This was where the NHL came to rude reckoning in the monumental power struggle. And, alas, this was where Paul Henderson won the final game with a fluky goal.

The walls adorned with pictures, banners and other memorabilia brought to life some of the most exciting moments so far experienced only through camera lenses. My head was beginning to spin. As if wandering in a daze I almost forgot the second most important reason of my visit – practice my English. Naturally, I expected a stalwart fan compliment even to the lowly Washington Capitals. I was not disappointed when rounding my first bend on the outer perimeter of the arena I noticed folks who could not possibly be my compatriots. They were wearing out-of-this-world white sneakers, Levi’s jeans and much lipstick. None of them, of course, missed a chance to don the uniform of their luckless Capitals and they all appeared to be the paragons of fashion and contentment for the sight-starved Soviets like me. But the most intriguing feature of this folk was their age, pensionable age to be exact. They all, just about unfailingly, exhibited white curls, whiskers and perfect plastic smiles.

“What the heck? Where are the young people?” I puzzled. The idea of an average American chasing his dream picket fence by the sweat of his brow was still a perfect unknown. Only later I learned that when exchanging one’s time for dollar signs there was usually not all that much of time left to dilly-dally around the world even if it had to do with hockey. The only people capable of such frivolities were my happy retirees on state pensions and Medicare.

Well, age was not the worst impediment. Few hundred of my younger compatriots were. Crowds were swirling around my cheerful seniors. Just like small and yet very snarly pests these clung and clawed, cutting the very valuable access to the freedom of English and commerce. Everybody, deprived of just about anything but staples, seemed to be clamouring to trade for anything made outside our glorious planning system.

Sneakers, jeans and beloved Capitals jerseys would have been in the most immediate danger of disappearing had it been not for the heavy militia presence. Most of the Russians, including proud Muscovites, were so desirous of some basic life joys such as a pair of white Nike sneakers that even trading one’s soul did not appear all that sacrilegious but even necessary. At first intrigued my pensioners were happy to deal if not for sneakers than surely for pins and hats. Unfortunately, problems of value started cropping up almost immediately. The truth was that hardly any of us, save for a happy couple in a possession of tattered Dynamo Moscow jerseys, had anything of any value that could even qualify for a USA-made undershirt let along anything with colour or beads. The holes in our economic system were just too large and obvious. With no goods and barely any English, their mighty American ship fit for the high seas passed our lost and tiny dingy with no major uproar or acknowledgement.

After the initial agiotage, the life resumed as only a couple of well-prepared Dynamo supporters had good enough pins to trade with shrewd grandmas. I think that since most of them were the retirees from the DC area, a goodly portion of them must have been with either CIA or FBI. Maybe this could explain their reticence to appreciate the sparse joys of Soviet consumer goods. Undoubtedly, they were up on the latest security briefings…

Bolstered by my recent Hungarian experience and the crowd retreat, I gingerly approached the tightly knit bunch to practice my English. This was the first time I had a chance to meet a real American. My first entreaty consisting of a simple “Hello” and “How are you” was more or less successful since it was understood, apparently. However, further proceedings unleashed a series of disheartening events. Their replies and few follow-up questions, instead of entering my ears, made a complete 180 in mid-air and bounced right back. Few more attempts delivered the same results, as my proud English vocabulary was completely snubbed by my, nearly total, inability to cut through the strange and slurred thicket of the American pronunciation. The more I tried to annunciate, the stupider I felt, as they mocked me with that ever-thicker, gurgling river raging past their open smiles and perfect white plastic teeth. I had to beat a retreat.

Reeling, I noticed, from a corner of my eye, those rare Dynamo supporters in jerseys. The lucky bastards were swapping their wares with a couple of adventurous pensioners. Failing to appreciate the subtlety of the exchange, I charged to the scene in hopes of a crucial break-through – maybe there was something for me. First I attempted to offer some basic pins for anything of theirs. It did not work. Not to be outdone, I ploughed further with some additional offerings of my personal Komsomol documents “These must be of some worth to these haters of Communism” I thought Snubbed again! In a growing sense of desperation, I threw in my trump card – the military watch. But satiated rich American bastards waived even this off. I felt entirely defeated. My English failed to break the impregnable thickness of the American defences and my proud entrepreneurial instincts encountered the all too rational fair value driven grandmas on their healthy but fixed income.

I was determined to take my revenge on the ice and I was disappointed as Dynamo drove the smug NHL millionaires into submission, proving that even in tattered sweaters we still boasted better and livelier hockey. Our team led by Golikov brothers pounded the proud Capitals something like 9 to 4. Even the heroics of Dino Ciccarelli did not help. He was also handily deterred by jeers as his name sounded precariously close to something very offensive in Russian. Good for us! The only inconvenience was the absence of a replay board that I hardly missed since I did not suspect that such existed in the first place.

At the end of the game I snuck into a post-game press conference. After my cheap seat behind the goal I could not imbibe enough of the atmosphere of this rare event. The press conference was open to the public and I went in early to claim a prime seat. Not bad, as in a matter of minutes the room was filled with numerous reporters of all stripes.

Some in crumpled grey suits sported tattered notepads and old portable recorders sized as large boom boxes. Others, in hip jeans and glitzy wing-tipped shoes, lugged portable typing machines and even early generation computers! To me, some of these dudes looked just like aliens minus antennas and funky face masks. The more laborious kind was not wasting their time typing frantically to deliver the breaking news of not so pivotal hockey game. Time was money, so was news, I guess. The press conference proved soothing since I was able to comprehend most of what was said – a much needed therapy after my fiasco with the curly grandmas. With my day mostly victorious, my English wounds partially healed I felt asleep to pre-natal dreams on the friend’s couch. Life was becoming ever more exciting and another day was just few hours away.


Potato Farmer
The return to school was smoothed by a three-week work break in the failing agricultural sector. As more and more rural folks had found their passage to the urban paradise over the years, the worse situation in the countryside had become. Nobody, of course, could fault the people for abandoning the land that did not belong to them in the first place. Aside from small private lots, everything was owned by everybody and consequently by none at all. The life was hard, brutish and short. Stalin even denied the peasants internal passports and thus the freedom of movement, save for few kilometres outside of their respective domiciles. If there have ever been a second class citizen in the workers’ paradise, the peasant was it. After the Great War, the country folk had enough and decided to take their revenge on the city by just simply moving in. Sure, the cities offered suffocating chemical fumes instead of air and concrete boxes instead of houses but at least there was some entertainment, underwear for sale and easier jobs that invariably paid better than back-breaking toils of the countryside.

So that’s how the predominantly agricultural society of the 1920s became staunch city dwellers by 1980s. To exacerbate the economic matters, the countryside was further disadvantaged, as the state poured most of its efforts in the grave undertakings of nuclear weaponry, rabbit fur hats and demanding automobiles that required just as much time under as in of their devout enthusiasts. By the time I arrived on the scene, the countryside could barely manage to feed its dwindling own let alone the whole state; the grain was routinely purchased from the bitter enemy, the USA; and the best one could do to salvage the crops, those that still managed to spring up, was to conscript the pliable student labour in the times of need. We learned this early on as from about grade 8 we would regularly spend few weeks in the fragrant fields picking tomatoes, cucumbers and anything else our central system managed to eke out.

Now this was in the summer, in the fall the fields were beset with university students. After all, the high schools could not spare their time spent in the hard drudge of essential education. The country was still in need of people who could “add, multiply, divide and subtract” (President Bush on No Child Left Behind policy). When in came to Calculus and Theoretical Mechanics the case appeared far less certain. So there we went, into the muck of vast potato fields of the Soviet breadbasket that was Ukraine – at least we had something to gather…

To my surprise, mid-fall in the country side was not at all that dreary as on most of the days we were visited by the radiant, post-Chernobyl, sun and caressing, almost evocative, steppe winds. It even was fun at times, as feeding the hungry city people seemed worthwhile and noble. Usually ready at the proverbial crack of dawn, we, having just scrubbed the nightly gooey off our faces, boarded an old rickety country bus to head for the fields. A short, ten minutes at the most, ride was always an adventure since the unpaved earthly ruts did not provide much of a dozing option. Quiet could not prevail and telling loud and sometimes indecent stories was the order, the one especially tantalizing given our colloquial co-ed arrangements. No particular tact was required, we all were equal and our collective appearance hardly betrayed any reference to sex. You see, the Soviets not only neglected to develop the timeless art of Haut Couture. They also omitted to spice up their work wardrobes.

In the fields we had to two options – one to pick potatoes by the bucket and the other to empty the bucket on the truck. The second task was more strenuous and yet more desirable since it, at least, kept your fingernails clean. I always jumped at the opportunity to load since standing on the truck also gave me a chance to open an English page or two in order not to loose any valuable time. And with all that fresh air, the brain worked particularly well. Alas, the loading was not my permanent occupation so frequently I shared in the task of traversing the mud burrows in search of valuable crops. Here our daily dose was measured in buckets picked. So, when feeling especially lazy, I would hard-tamp half of my bucket with fresh dirt so in order to collect another bucket-point all one had to do to pick just a half – anything to amuse oneself rather than inflict harm on dear collective farm, really.

After usually spending about five hours of work we returned to our barrack-like accommodations to a hearty lunch and well-deserved nap. I really needed it since my light night sleep was frequently interrupted by much more permanent co-habitants of the windy barracks – mice. These playful creatures usually stayed quiet at daytime but at night it was their time to exercise. Snoring or stuffing your ears with cotton were the only possible options. I eschewed either, tossing and turning on my metal-mesh bed, hoping to keep the races off my bedspread. I succeeded sometimes but only sometimes.

The later part of the day was entirely ours and I enjoyed it to the fullest taking my daily jogs along the local fields and cow barns. It was magic. The air was filled with singing bucolic solitude; the early October weather was warm and dry; fragrances of newly harvested grains filled one with freshness unknown to an industrial urbanite. The exercise, exhilarating country air and well-prepared organic meals provided so much energy and zest that certain privations of one’s privacy were blissfully forgotten. Who cares about industrialization, I should have been an English squire instead…

With entertainment dearth only other alternative was to visit a neighbouring farmer’s house. This dude not only had a TV but also an enigmatic VCR machine that showed all sorts of western wonders, illicit and otherwise. He was a venal sort of fellow as the word “free” was not in his vocabulary and yet for a small fee we could indulge our senses way past the vast potato furrows yonder. Sometimes, given the poor film dubbing, my English came handy in explaining the intricate differences between “What’s up” and “How are you” to my unilingual cohorts.

My promising homecoming, burdened by a couple of hefty potato sacks, was overshadowed by rather painful news - my grandfather succumbed to a significant stroke. At first he looked to be recovering quite well with his speech slowly returning and his thinking clearing up. However, the less than vigilant Soviet medical system was all too ill-equipped to handle ongoing issues such as repeating strokes through the usage of such banal means as blood-thinning drugs. As a result, he must have experienced a series of further undetected strokes that contributed to his ultimate demise a couple of years later. In any event these were the last days to enjoy his company in the best sense as he was gradually sinking deeper and deeper into the morass of senility and feebleness.

Being a rather motivated type, I tried to shake off my personal loss by enjoying my studies at the university. Up to this point, a bulk of my time in the evenings was spent at the university basketball practices. But this year was different. I must have been maturing. Some youthful non-pragmatic ideals were giving way to something more concrete and tangible. Coming upon my third year trying to make the starting line up, I began to realise that my emulations of Larry Byrd were not likely to result in anything meaningful triumph. I was short, stocky and white - deathly attributes for a NBA career. Hence, I chose to trade my three-point shooting workouts for additional English classes.

The Soviet educational system was free and generous. They even paid us a stipend, which was typically sufficient to keep one fed with barely nutritious and yet survivable grub. It was also accessible when wanting to attend classes for no credit. If one cared to audit additional courses, you could just approach a course instructor, obtain his permission and voila. So I did just that, obtaining an access to the English faculty evening classes. This time I got to take my classes with people, who chose English as a teaching career. The level of knowledge, intensity and speed was markedly higher than any of my previous experiences. The increase in academic hours was playing its part and I started noticing very quick and meaningful progress. The mumbling Hungarian and Moscow hockey encounters were becoming a distant memory and I was scaling new heights. Few months later, bored by the classes in labour safety and some other mind-numbing bunk, I started taking day classes at the English faculty. I took a bit of work convincing but at the end I managed to weasel into the class of Mr. Solovov.


Mr. Solovov, the American
As the promising 1980s were melting fast to a close, any societal promises of collective Nirvana were dribbling into historic oblivion. Comrade Gorbachev and his Perestroika were clearly not going to cut it for everybody. Alas, somebody had to be a loser. Nobody wanted to be that. We all wanted to be winners; we all wanted to be Americans. Not one for miles around was more American than Mr. Solovov, a prof with the University English department.

Mr. Solovov was very unorthodox for a Soviet professor. He was a tall, gangly type that sported thick-rimmed glasses perched on the intelligent face criss-crossed with a few friendly wrinkles. The arrangement was permanently topped by a bunch of messy straw coloured hair. The genius was complete with a perpetual pair of stone-washed jeans, crumply blue cotton shirt and white basketball sneakers. If in doubt of further attributes think Bill Gates; they could be mistaken for a brotherly pair.

Mr. Solovov’s imposingly lumbering frame and deep voice could have made him a first rate Soviet bureaucrat in a crumpled Polish-made polyester suit. Sad for the party as this one was lost to the treacherous land of the most libertarian foreign influences and it showed, as Mr. Solovov stridently eschewed any formality, pomp and circumstance, traits so common among the Soviet wizards of foreign tongues. Instead he always appeared relaxed, approachable and enjoyment-ready. There was a sort of a 1960s aura about the dude with his unshakable serenity of countenance and his beloved guitar that he dragged anytime to anywhere. Forgetting any hefty suitcases befitting his academic rank, he would always open a class with a song or two, some of his own making, even. Imagine that, behind the iron curtain!

His classes lacked any traditional routine of pomp and forced learning. It was always sort of a free-for-all. Such rebellious deviations from the norm made him a huge success. The whole town spoke of Mr. Solovov. He not only added much needed colour to the very intelligent but bleak Soviet academia, but he also offered what not many around could – he taught exclusively American English. Of course, the Queen’s tongue was still in high demand, but with America rising as the only remaining superstar of all post-Soviet hopes, less and less of us were looking to get entangled into the heavy jewel studded folds of the royal language.

We thirsted for freedom and the gurgling American seemed just so unfettered in its universal appeal. To no one’s astonishment Mr. Solovov’s doors were coming unhinged under the weight of the desirous. Solovov with his guitar and scuffed-up sneakers was an incredible propaganda success for the American version. His teaching style, freewheeling and intuitive was just the ground that the fertility of our young minds longed for. The amazing part was that he did it all without first hand experience – he had never been to the States. Whatever he lacked in firsthand knowledge though, he picked up through various contacts, radio, songs and colloquial dictionaries. He typically taught without resorting to boring grammatical texts. He deliberately strayed from deep theoretical discussions. Instead his grammatical explanations moved right to the point of practical application through some hilarious drills of his own design.

All was made sound easy, playful and enjoyable. Mr. Solovov did not separate grammatical drills from reading or speaking, he blended it all in one continuous and colourful array. In this fashion the language stuck naturally, as if it were taught in a native environment. There was always a lot of joking and horsing around - never a simple task one had to really strain to stay within the party guidelines. To make matters even more detached from the grey reality, all had to assume western nicknames and behave as if we had the First Amendment. Mine was Rocky. I did not know whether it had anything to do with my Stallone-ic hair or bench-pressed chest, but it stuck forever. It did take a bit of getting used to but after a while I wouldn’t have it any other way. Besides, Rocky handily beat my high school sobriquet of Boris, hands down.

The key part of almost any class was a group chat. Free for all, on nearly any imaginable topic, these were the most fun. The pace required a certain degree of alertness, wide vocabulary and some wit. Mr. Solovov loved to throw his own two bits in a low mumbling voice peppered with obscure slang expressions. It was a challenging and exciting derby and having my horses coming last was not appealing. At first, it was challenging as I was not an English major. But after a few months of determinate toiling I was becoming really decent at it and at times even out-slugged all those Cindies, Robbies and Janes.

Mr. Solovov’s local fame and appeal extended far beyond the school walls. In the late 80s, the country was opening up and more and more people were seeking basic foreign language skills. A great number of locals also enjoyed fewer restrictions on immigration. The floodgates opened and some lucky Soviets dispersed throughout the world, searching for better life. Israel, Canada, Australia were becoming staple destinations. The US always remained the most coveted. Mr. Solovov could work 24 hours a day if he wanted to. His famed methods attracted people from far and wide. Eventually, he quit the University altogether, opening his own full-blown private school that has been enjoying much success for more than fifteen years now. The bulk of the workload has apparently been picked up by Mr. Solovov’s former students to allow more time for the master to spend on honing his guitar/singing skills that have apparently graduated to CD publishing levels.

Although our paths have not crossed for years, I will always be grateful to this funny, unorthodox, at times awkward and indiscernible, but always colourful man for helping me in mastering my American. My Jewish rooted self is especially grateful considering that I did not need to put up a penny for my experience.


Georgian Intermezzo
Whenever having all that much fun one is always well-advised to consider the flip side. The Bible in fact is quite clear about it when Jesus proffers his preference for the house of mourning and not the abode of joy. Alas, for many of us, the awakening arrives a tad too late. So when faced with something tragic we stand naked in our unprepared innocence. The death of my grandmother and my father in a close succession was just such a moment of belated reckoning. In my case, the fate had hard time convincing the one who had barely burst from the uncertain shell of the dodgy adolescence and into the firmer pastures of the adulthood. So just a month or so after my grandmother’s demise, I could not resist an opportunity to take a jaunt with Misha and our Czech visa money to the mountainous paradise of Georgia, the Soviet Republic. No ability to know the future, however close, was surely a blessing since leaving my father, who had only few weeks to live, at home did not seed any remorse in my callous youthful heart.

Why Georgia? A year or two prior, Misha went on a Komsomol junket to coalesce with other youth leaders in the glorious confines of our great capital Moscow. This was a neat occasion to hobnob with ideologically sound and unabashedly ambitious. In the midst of the festivities, Misha got particularly attached to the Georgian delegation. These folks were fun. All dressed up to the nines with their leather jackets, aquiline noses and almond complexions they were just all too irresistible. They handily conveyed that elusive sense of the economic affluence and the intellectual prowess. They all came from the historically aware Tiflis and all exuded their warm southern charm. When meeting they even kissed one another regardless of gender or rank. Misha was smitten.

You see, in the Soviet lore like in any other multicultural aquarium, there have always been majorities and minorities with their racists tensions and preferences. The Soviet folklore was just bursting at the seams with rationally charged jokes to address various disequilibria. Chukchi (Soviet Eskimos) were always derided for their lack of European sense aggravated by the misfortune to live on the edge of the civilization. Jews were picked on for too much rationality and self-deprecating wit, while Georgians paid for their citrus-fed riches. With the Soviet agriculture failing for decades, the peasants usually substituted their earnings with sales of personally grown crops at the city markets. None ranked higher in profitability than lemons and oranges of Transcaucasia. This, and not petrol and gas, made many relatively wealthy folks from the Caucuses with their flashy clothing, fast cars and comically abrupt mannerisms a butt of copious Soviet jokes. Add some spicy accents and the Soviet Sicilians were ripe for perpetual ridicule. But underneath all this was old green envy. We envied their cars, jewellery and even their accents. The fathers of perspective brides wished for a Georgian prince with Lada in tow; engineers and doctors wanted to trade their dreary incomes for a personable citrus plantation; and wives were always a prey to the darts of the southern eyes in the latest jeans and leather.

Not surprisingly, our upwardly agile Misha found them hip and cultivated the connection with abandon. The warmest ties developed were those with Mary who, despite her soft velvety dark eyes, induced exclusively (for once!) platonic feelings in the amorous heart of our friend. They kept in touch for a while. She invited him for a visit and I gladly joined in. A trip to the very heart of the Soviet Eldorado – the capital Tiflis, or Tbilisi as it was known then – looked too good pass up.

Our timing in the early March was just perfect. With winter still raging in our backs, we looked forward to something more palatable and were not disappointed. The day of our arrival was announced with glorious sunshine that bronzed the steep cascading banks that precipitously plunged the city towards the raging waters of Kura. The views were just fabulous, fitting this ancient seat of the Georgian nation founded back in the 5th century. Surrounded by snow capped peaks of the mighty Caucuses one could smell the national historic pride ripe with economic and cultural successes that visibly smoothed the scenery in the harmony of the veritable architectural mosaic. Ancient churches of the Georgian Orthodox Church gleaming in the subdued pink perfectly co-existed next to the surprisingly tasteful modernity that exuded chic and sophistication. This was not just another nameless Soviet city bristling with endless boredom of identical apartment blocks, this was a true magnet, exuberant and brilliant, sure and eternal.

Meeting Mary for the first time gave me another sparkle of intrigue. She, in a stylish silk head covering and tasteful rimmed glasses, looked a spitting image of Benazir Bhutto. All glamour in lipstick and assurance in pose, I immediately thought of the legendary leader, the queen Tamar, who presided over the golden Georgian age some centuries back. Alas, unlike Tamar, Mary did not live in the palace. Instead she shared a three-bedroom affair with her family consisting of her mother, an uncle and a nephew. The place, just few steps away from the main city drag, was great despite the apparent lack of queenly attributes. The street was tranquil and head-spinning mountainous air was filled with an impossible aroma of evergreen cypresses that bedecked the sidewalks. For us, the products of the pollution filled industrial devastation, all looked like a paradise. Accorded a full room with a large bed, all to ourselves, Misha and I endeavoured to explore the magic city.

Predictably, Mary was our steady companion in this undertaking. She, an English University student, was happy to share my affinity for the international tongue. And after exchanging a few dashes of the banal phraseology she determined I was good enough to play a prank on one of her friends. From that point on I was to assume an identity of a Russian-born American who came to visit his friend Misha. I spoke Russian but with a heavy accent, I was from New York or something close and I was to enlighten this specimen, named David, on all intricacies of the lavish American living. This was not all that problematic in my new white sneakers, goose feather coat and striped clown pants that hailed all the way from Finland. David, a slightly younger chap, was all over me. He might have fallen in love had I been of the different sex. Once found I could not escape. At all hours of the day he would show up just to take a peak at the American glories. Frequently I felt too burdened to keep up the role but Mary and Misha’s prodding kept me afloat. I had to make up stories about everything – race relations, gas guzzling cars and cops who were a particular target of David’s fascination undoubtedly fed with many a western thriller. These were widely available in the theatres and on the black market VHS tapes alike. To this day I think that whatever acting juices have ever resided in my head, most of them were exhausted in this shameful ruse. To be frank I do not even remember why Mary needed to play it on David. The only fact that soothes my soul is that he has never found it. Besides, being a Canadian today provides a reasonable degree of eventual legitimacy.

Between the shameful posturing and the glorious cypress aromas, Mary took us on a few culinary outings. The Georgians were the masters of anything that went in one’s mouths, food or drink. The foods were inexorably spicy and non-vegetarian. Huge spicy dumplings that could kill a person from a ten-foot freefall were the ultimate hit. Dripping with all sorts of juices and dipped in fresh yogurt these were scrumptiously incredible. However, nothing could beat Georgian wines. Available in surprising abundance these were too tempting to miss. Here, unlike the rest of the country, one had no difficulty procuring alcohol. While liquor lines were frequently unending in Russia and Ukraine, the places perennially beset by rampant alcohol abuse; here no one had to wait in line to get a bottle. And yet the streets did not produce much in a way of helpless drunks. There was something distinctly more temperate in the local consumption patters. Was it the non-prohibitive abundance, or deeply rooted historic customs, or just plain common sense, I would never know but the temptation to bring some home quickly filled any extra space in our bags.

If streets were bereft of public alcoholism displays, Mary’s family had aplenty to struggle with as her uncle was rather fond of the bottle. So much so that whenever at the family dinner table we had to endure his lengthy and very slurred viewpoints. The difficulty was multiplied since the dude did not speak all that much Russian so one had to dive deep into the sign language to understand anything. Forget English, I had to learn Georgian instead. An old language was certainly not a piece of cake by any stretch. Apart from a cryptic alphabet of more than forty letters one had to learn to scream and roar to replicate the primordially guttural sounds of the tongue. One might think that I am exaggerating but whenever our hosts talked with any degree of passion I had a sensation of an impending murder. And yet it never came even to a simple fist fight. Apparently this was just their tone of a normal dinner conversation.

I asked Mary to give us some languages pointers. She started by giving us, Misha and I, a test to say “Bakhahi Zhali Khihineps” which meant something like “frog is squawking in the water”. What does the frog have to do with anything? Mostly nothing except pronouncing it correctly made my throat really hurt. Misha excelled and I was disqualified. So to prove the point I started on my Georgian alphabet and Misha did his crossword puzzles in Russian.

After few eventful days in Tbilisi we were ready for a three-day junket high up into the Caucuses for my first ever skiing trip. Driving to the resort of Gudauri perching at about ten thousand feet of altitude was truly adventurous. I had never been past four thousand feet let alone ten – wow. Our school friends Shura and Anikei were already there, zigzagging the slopes to their hearts delight. They were really daring, these two. At the times when possessing anything similar to a set of alpine skiing gear was a true miracle, this must have been their third expedition into the snow capped mountains – quite a jump from the sea-levelled Ukraine. Each time, after a couple of weeks on the slopes, they came home with an unbelievable tan and huge hockey bags full of Georgian wine. I did know about two weeks but tasting a bit of the Alpine paradise sounded like an excellent idea. The prospects were all the more exciting since skiing in Gudauri centered around an Austrian-built resort with everything and anything western – ski lift, hotel, restaurants and an indoor swimming pool! We, including Anikei and Shura, had no money in the world to stay at the hotel reserved for people with dollars but at least having a look at the riches sounded like a worthy prospect. Besides, maybe I could practise my English…

The windy ride to the top was a little scare in itself as we navigated in an old beat-up Lada that barely managed to keep about its wits even before we met the snow line. Past the forlorn mountainous villages encircled by wandering goats and climbing grapevines – I had enough distractions at first. Seeing the locals in their woollen head caps, thick ornamented vests and walking shepherd sticks reminded me of the fact that this region boasted one of the highest life expectancies in the world. Here, an impossible Soviet age of one hundred was not unheard of. We had to be careful though as making past our twenties looked precarious once we hit the snow line. Our Lada was sliding in between rocks and precipices like a drunken sailor. I had to hold my breath and count the kilometres. Three, two, one – we arrived in one piece!

The place was just glorious. Above the tree line with tonnes and tonnes of snow it literally soared like an intrepid battleship into the bottomless blue skies. With Shura and Anikei promptly located, we drove to their wood-hewn lodge that was to be our home for a couple of nights. It was Spartan and yet spacious enough to feel secure amidst all this snow and cold. Sure, during the day under the sun it was so warm that some skied in thin sweaters and t-shirts. But with setting sun one had to brace for deep sub-z.

Now I was just itching to try the snow. Unfortunately, the gear for rent was only for dollars and Shura with Anikei were not about to give up their glory, I would have to wait till tomorrow. For now we trudged to the mid-slope section where they had a loud cafeteria with many a personality to feast one’s eyes on. The air was exhilaratingly fresh and short. It just wasn’t enough of it. At first I did not pay attention as just I attributed my panted breath to the lack of hiking conditioning. Besides, one could hardly care with all that technological and natural brilliance around. The real wonder was the speed lift that whisked the lucky pass holders faster than wind. Once on the very top the views were just unendingly inebriating. Throw in some shapely hips, fashionable gear and satisfied western smiles and one could have been on the different planet. “Slam” the door just opened with the whole army of well-tanned Georgian regulars crashing for a quick rest between runs. A couple of low-set sinewy types quickly settled for a bowl of hot soup and a game for elbow-wrestling. Mary, apparently enthused by my impersonating talents and an oversized, tightly bound in a Puma sweater, chest made a quick wager with the soup slurpers – I was to elbow-wrestle.

Now, I have to declare of never been big on anything of wrestling preferring to hide my personal failings behind the camaraderie of game sports. Here I was on the spot, naked as it were. Well, this was no time to waste. I sat down facing my vicious looking opponent with an errant noodle on his cheek and a Popeye-sized forearms. I stretched my arm and strained with my eyeballs thrusting within an easy reach from my opponent’s relaxed visage. “Bam!” my wrestling career was over faster than it began. Cowering in shame, the idea of a friendly après-ski with Anikei and Shura was the most appealing. The feast loaded with wine, meat and whatever else we managed to find in their fridge was a success.

All the more painful was my wake-up. I had high fever, felt disoriented and weak. My first full day on the top of the world was not looking good. Straining to shake the funk, I persevered in mounting on the Anikei’s gear and making some efforts in the deep fresh snow. But instead of a relief I felt like a seagull trapped in the Exxon Valdese spill. Flopping and falling only made my heart race faster than I could count. It was time to check into the local clinic located in the Austrian paradise. By the time I made it, I could hardly walk and felt my worst. No amount of luxury was enough to tease me into distraction.

At the doctor’s office they did not offer much past a tablet of aspirin. Here the universal laws of the Soviet medicine did not seem to apply since the only advice I could get was to go lie down, close your eyes and hope to get better. I clearly couldn’t stay another night. But not willing to be a party pooper I waited for Misha to finish his skiing pleasures. Finally my delirium in the hotel lobby was pleasantly interrupted “Are you ready?” This was Misha with rosy cheeks freshened up by the exercise – the bastard.

We left that promptly. Exhausted, I slept most of the way down. I was so out of it that even the wavy ways of our Lada did not bother me any longer. Once back in Tbilisi, my condition improved by the minute with headache and fever leaving without a trace. Suddenly I realized that this was my first brush with the altitude sickness, a treacherous creature indeed. Happy to be back to my old self, I joyously celebrated with the perpetually smashed uncle. This was a true gift to live another day, another day to act out American dreams, meet new people and celebrate with the old friends. Unfortunately, the time to part came all too quickly. Partially sad with bottles of stuff jingling in my suitcase I was saying good-bye to the brightly lit city streets. Suddenly I saw a sign that read “აეროდრომი”. Right away I knew that it said “Airport” – Eureka, I have not wasted my time!

Wednesday

In His Service

“One who never visits the neighbour’s farm always thinks that his is the biggest”. I was struck by this Nigerian observation that transcended borders and cultures. Expressed differently across the world it carries the same meaning regardless of geographic location. Some, never given an opportunity, do not ever get to see across the fence. Others never bother looking. Those, who get to see the neighbour’s farm, are driven by various factors. Some force the issue by summoning the power of selfish ambition; others prepare and pray, waiting for God to use them when their time comes. Chris unquestionably falls into the latter category. Calm and almost serene, his godly humility is palpable as he confidently recounts his life, or rather his service to the Lord.

In the world, the words humility and confidence typically clash with the ferocity of bitter and irreconcilable rivals. In God, they can co-exist in an amazing harmony. Chris Ishola’s walk with the Lord started early as he grew up in a Christian family with his father running a Baptist mission near Lagos, Nigeria. At about twelve Chris knew that he wanted to serve God. But going directly into the ministry was not exactly on his mind. With financial hardships commonplace this path was not always a viable option with many a church relying on volunteer leadership.

After contemplating his academic future, Chris chose accountancy, a profession that offered not only a rewarding career but also a chance to support Chris’s passion – missions. His professional career and missions came to satisfying fruition after joining The Christ Embassy in Lagos. This large and growing church offered opportunity aplenty. Chris, together with five others, decided to start a satellite church and spread the gospel in one of the suburbs of the huge metropolis. They were undaunted, renting a building and spending much of their after work hours in the neighbourhood evangelization campaigns. God rewarded their efforts with many a convert to Jesus. Chris thanked God and continued praying for God’s will in his live.

Sometime in the late 1990s, Chris was sent by his employer, a bank, to set up a new branch in Port Harcourt, the capital of the burgeoning Nigerian oil industry. Going to this, not the friendliest of places, Chris could have been puzzled with new destination God called him to. Instead he welcomed the opportunity. As he arrived one of the first people he met there was someone special. Now the purpose of his trip was clear and few moths later Chris returned to Lagos with his wife Augusta.

By 1999, God was calling Chris and Augusta to a different mission field – Canada. So in 2001, after spending a couple of years in Britain, they arrived here. God was first in their hearts and Chris, after re-establishing himself as professional accountant, received his new mission assignment. This came in good time, as Chris was asked to help with the teaching of Starting Point at Calvary. Once again, God rewarded Chris with a chance to serve him.

“What’s next?” Chris just humbly raised his eyes toward heaven and placed himself in the hands of the Almighty. Assured and confident in divine providence, he knows for sure that whatever he will be doing next will have God’s seal of approval on it.

Friday

Hitler Appeasement - Misuse of Analogy

This is a not a new subject in the least and, consequently, the public domain is peppered with related discussions. In this sense it seems unnecessary that I would want to throw in my two cents worth. However, this is not as much as to feed my vainglorious pretensions but to alert some of my sparse reader audience to the frequent invocations of the Hitler appeasement analogy and its just as common misuse. Why should this be important?

If you do not care what Canada will do next in Afghanistan or whether the US will bomb Iran in the next few months then the utility of this opinion is pretty worthless. Otherwise just turn on your TV and count how many times Hitler appeasement will be invoked as a reason to either persist in our current and very fruitless military undertakings; or, worse, use a pre-emptive and unjustified force against somebody else. The scary part that this invocation works like a charm as I often observe even very smart media pundits becoming completely stumped when arguing for more peaceful stance in foreign relations and military interventions. I have even heard it flogged around as a valid argument for tougher anti-crime laws – what a tragic misuse of history! At this point some might laugh as to point out that this is just rhetoric. Not so hasty as such un-rebutted rhetoric has produced much public support that was necessary to unleash the most famous unjust war of our generation – Iraq.

Any delay in dealing with Saddam posed a “grave” threat in 2003 as the intransigent ghost of the Hitler chief nemesis Winston Churchill happened to be just as effective as false American intelligence claims. Hitler sells and sell him they did. They continue in the same tracks when either drumming public support for a potential anti-Iranian strike or for persisting in refusal to engage Taliban in any meaningful political process to stop madness known as the great Afghan democratic experiment. They use many arguments, real and phantom; they write opinions, pontificate on TV and bombard Internet. Among all this the Hitler appeasement analogy is the one that almost always goes unchecked making it a must in any hawk discourse.

Personally, I do not mind a well-reasoned argument but it is impossible unless we purge ourselves of many a myth with Hitler appeasement analogy stuck at the top of the list. However, if embarking on a difficult task of turn tables within the modern realm of second-long sound bites, considering the history itself sounds like a good option.

Hitler came to power in 1933 amidst much economic adversity and political jitters, two serious illnesses that imposed on the tired Weimar Republic and its octogenarian president, Mr. Hindenburg. Hitler was decisive and fast, forcefully advancing his agenda and claiming the effective control of the country within a matter of months. As earlier as 1934 he commenced a systematic military build-up in violation of then prevailing international agreements with the feeble Treaty of Versailles as the cornerstone, a perennial irritant to Germany. The ensuing international reaction was hardly adequate as the world was dealing with the devastating economic depression of the 1930s and was not in the mood to act decisively in the diplomatic or military sense. With country whipped up in patriotic fervour, Hitler, in violation of the Treaty of Versailles, militarized the Rhineland in 1936. This was just the beginning. By 1938 Germany boasted the second largest world economy, the biggest and the most modern army; and a frenzied ideologue as its chief. Results did wait to follow. In March 1938, in violation of international laws and his own previous commitment, Hitler marched in and annexed Austria. Now his sights were set on Sudetenland, a part of Czechoslovakia with substantial German population.

At this stage, the West could no longer sit and watch history rush by. Britain (Chamberlain), France (Daladier) and, to the lesser extent, the USA (FDR) sought an opportunity to check any further Nazi aggression by reasoning with old Adolf, trying to see if any compromise could be reached. They got together in September 1938 in Munich to hatch the infamous Munich Declaration. In it, the western leaders essentially left Czechoslovakia to the dogs, by acknowledging Hitler’s territorial Sudetenland demands and agreeing to a speedy transfer of these territories to the German Reich. As a result, Czechoslovakia was sacrificed in the belief that Hitler’s ambitions could be thus checked, preventing any further aggression. Many in West rejoiced some were indignant and prophetic with Mr. Churchill topping the list.

He, at least this time, was completely correct in his fear as Hitler proceeded to not only occupy the Sudetenland but also invading the rest of Czechoslovakia, signalling a fateful beginning of what would lead to the most horrible war in the history of the human kind.

So what are characteristics of the Munich appeasement that could be clearly identified as to create an analogy? The most important one is the western mistake of compromising on the subject of the territorial demands. The other is the failure to spot an aggression amidst a military built up wrapped up in patriotic fervour that frequently identified the intended target. In my view, unless these characteristics are met, the use of the Hitler appeasement analogy is completely unjustified. This is not to say that it is never appropriate. However, when it comes to many current issues its pervasive and unqualified use creates nothing but misinformation and propaganda.

Iraq, of course, was the most blatant example. Saddam did not undertake any military build up, did not openly threaten anyone or laid any territorial claims in 2003. On the other hand, the USA undertook a military build-up, threatened and falsified. In my mind, here if anybody was playing Hitler it was the Bush administration.

How about Iran? Are they currently undertaking a military build-up? Answer is no as there is no credible proof to contradict their peaceful intentions vis-à-vis nuclear developments, and the rest of their military seems to be in a rather pitiful state. Do they use hostile rhetoric and identified targets? Well, their record here is mixed, as they can claim a right to “reciprocate” when faced with the sobriquet of “Axis of Evil” and in the view of their subsequent attempts to propose extensive peace terms to the US in 2003. On the other hand, Mr. Ahmadinejad’s latest verbal exercises clearly do not provide much comfort to his detractors. How about territorial claims? There are no claims to register besides the support for Iraqi Shea. However, this one is easily counterbalanced by the American support for MEK, an anti-Tehran group that is documented to have undertaken terror attacks within Iran.

How does all this compare to the American position in this growing conflict. Is there a military build up? Unquestionably, as evidenced by the Gulf presence of the large US Navy force that now includes three aircraft carriers. The overall US direct strike capacity has been steadily increasing just outside of the Iranian territorial forces as of late. Has the US threatened Iran or visa versa? While the Iranian record on the subject is vague, the US record is unequivocal and includes very open and very public musings of the current administration regarding the use of force. Does the US have territorial demands? No explicit ones other than openly looking for a regime change with a friendly government to follow.

The question is: can one truthfully play a Hitler appeasement analogy card in this situation? The answer should be NO for either side. Who is the bigger villain? It is up to you to decide…


Monday

Why Do We Pine for a Christian Nation?

He desperately wanted a drink, anything, water or wine, will do as long as could quench his thirst, to soothe this terrible onslaught of dry dust that so heavily swirled in the air reminding him of the dreary swamp mosquitoes of the his northern domains. The dry dust penetrated every crevice it could find and was so seething as if alive. And yet he did not call his servant and bore the lack of comforts stoically in keeping with his habit of sharing everyday hardships of bare military existence with his army. Here in the midst of the olive-beset hills though, these feelings could hardly be any more foreign tempting with an order to stop and rest, but not now. Simple pleasures of life within an easy reach of a spoken word would have to wait for much more glorious apogee. The never settling dust was churned by the warrior multitude in polished helmets, gleaming armour and with razor sharp swords that persistently glistened attempting to light up an already bright crisp day that promised to be anything but ordinary.

He was Constantine or rather Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantine, the soon to be sole ruler of the immense Roman Empire. Very soon as it was about to unfold with Constantine consumed by his fateful quest to overturn the last stronghold of defence that was the Eternal City itself, still under control of his archrival Maxentius. The Tiber, the last obstacle, was finally within his perceptive gaze and the future of the Empire was within his grasp. Few hours later, on the late afternoon October 28 312 AD, Constantine will have enough wine to bathe in, the decisive battle of the Milvian Bridge will be over and Maxentius will be dead caught in the treacherous Tiber currents upon his hasty retreat from the slaughter raging behind. Could have this ended differently? Impossible! God had spoken to Constantine through a sign of the cross just a day earlier. Caught completely mesmerized, Constantine’s face shone brilliantly as he clearly saw a cross rising up in the sky above tomorrow’s battlefield. The voice of the Lord came to him and announced “In this sign you will conquer!” It could not have ended differently or at least to those who take the story at its face legendary value.


Constantine Legacy – Emergence of “Christian State”
And if in need of further proof of Constantine intentions one is inexorably led to the Edict of Milan that proclaimed legalization of Christianity and complete freedom of practise for its followers. What followed was a remarkable transformation of this vibrant and growing sect into perhaps the most powerful religious movement in human history. This event and many other similar historical turns should clearly be celebrated by anyone claiming an allegiance to Christ. And yet it is not always the case. In fact, frequently it is quite the opposite. And the message of what has followed since is quite a mixed one at the very best.

The famed edict and other important events that followed hardly propelled Christianity into something worthy of Christ – pure, incorrupt and inspiring. Instead it appears that Christ was set aside for political expediencies of the powerful, first and foremost. What ensued could hardly be characterized as victory for Christianity – savagery, intolerance and wars of just about any length, size or reason. This is hardly a palatable canvass to further the faith and many have shied away, quite understandably, from any association with such besmirched past. So much so that contemporary Christians much rather forget crusades, inquisition and slavery, the less glorious and appetising bits of our past. Forget they may but not before some facts are examined.

Now, some would like to vehemently object to the usage of the unsavoury and sometimes outright gruesome past as having anything to do with authentic Christianity of the Bible. And my answer to these folks “You are absolutely right!” What were the theological foundations behind the crusades? Why were many a non-conformist savagely burned at the stake? Which part of Christ’s legacy elevated one ethnic group over another? Of course, the answer, again and again, is a resounding “NO”. The fact however is that had it been not for the Bible the powerful would have conjured up other excuses to subject the poor; and had it been not for the Bible the cruel would have twisted the arms of the weak all the same. The Bible was simply used as a façade to undertake all kinds of ungodly acts. Remember how the pious Henry VIII rejected the Catholic Mass to facilitate his unlawful divorce from his first wife, Catherine of Aragon; how frumpish and very protestant Oliver Cromwell killed, raging against episcopacy; how very catholic Luis XIV built his unitary kingdom by rupturing peace with protestant Huguenots; and how Isabella of Castile endeavoured to commit her own version of Holocaust. Clearly all these avowedly Christian rulers fell hopelessly far behind anything even remotely resembling Christianity.

Am I trying to pick the most unappetizing pieces of history to the make the point? Yes, to some extent. What I am not saying, hovewer, is that the “Christian States” were completely evil and grotesque. Not at all as evidence aplenty of great piety in matters of political deeds, evoking cathedrals and inspiring art work. What I am saying is that these states on the totality of their deeds do not fare any better than those of infidels. What’s worse is that sometimes they fared distinctly worse when in direct comparison. Just recall the difference in treatment of Jews between the Spanish crown and its rivalling predecessors – the Moors, Islamic invaders.

No wonder that not many in the Christian circles celebrate the Middle Ages, precisely the times when Christianity and State were the inseparable. Even the fresh winds of reformation failed to produce much improvement in the state affairs while making incredibly progressive strides in all matters of theology. Maybe the state and church do not really mix, just like oil and water?

“Oh sure that was in the Middle Ages but what about now?” this is an inevitable question. Right!
And what do we observe? The general amelioration of the human condition replete in trappings of secular enlightenment! Hot secular fires of French revolution, nuanced Dutch mercantilism and staunchly communal Swiss provided much fodder for new ideas and ensuing developments. Now, we were still very far from any sort of an ideal and harmony as well-evidenced by indisputable evils of world wars and genocides of the past hundred years. And yet, our appreciation of multi-faceted nature of God’s creation has resulted in less intolerance, better cooperation and fairer laws. And all this is taking place at the time when the notion of “Christian State” is becoming ever more obsolete – fascinating…


God’s Own Experiment
OK all rhetoric aside, let’s talk about God’s own experiment in church-state creation - the institution of the state of Israel - the experiment that failed to produce anywhere close to the desired result. God Almighty gave chance and again to the recalcitrant sons of Israel only to witness perennially sinful disobedience cropping up, first in men’s hearts and then in their actions. God persevered and provided countless mulligan opportunities for redemption and restoration. God grew exasperated with his obstreperous children. He gave them carrots and sticks. Carrots of promises failed to work, sticks of devastation and defeats did not do much better. Finally, God brought his ultimate and unbeatable trump card – the sacrifice of his only begotten son on the cross. The emergence of Jesus drove the final nail in the coffin of church-state. From now on, church and state will go their separate ways. From now on faith and faith alone will be a uniting factor for those under the banner of the Lord. Territory, skin colour or language will no longer be a determinant of those serving the Most High. In fact, families will be divided and brother will rise against his sibling and parents will disown their own as the eternal boundary of the final judgement to come will cut through the most unlikely of places not sparing anything including the bonds of kinship and blood. And if in doubt on this count just listen to Jesus himself in John 18:36 – “My Kingdom does not belong to this world” said he when questioned by the authorative Pilot. Had it been he would not have taken up the Cross.

This is not new, of course, as just about any biblical scholar would concede that the prevalent Jewish expectations of that day were clearly at odds with the message of salvation. Yes, Jews expected the Warrior Messiah or President Messiah and instead received a Weak and Humble Messiah (Isaiah 54). Nothing emphases the disparity of expectations and reality more than Jesus’ refusal to deviate from the matters of the heart and plunge into the matters of the state. He did not deny or concede any taxation authority to Caesar; he was so utterly discreet as to use a fish’s mouth to produce a coin to pay taxes; and he hardly picked a quarrel with anyone but the teachers of the law. If anything he broke the rules, the rule the earthly state cannot stand without. He healed on Sabbath and eschewed ceremonial washing; he refused to see his family in the middle of a sermon; and made friends with the outcasts. If anything he was a rebel and an anarchist. He even fed the five thousand gratis without bothering with the moral implications of a free unearned meal; he destroyed public swine property in favour of delivering one little lunatic free of evil. He was above ordinary; he was not earthly except for his suffering; he was of God.

Maybe I am making too many strides in the wrong direction but what is clear is that Jesus went out of his way to make sure that his Kingdom was to be outside of the world as we know it and his singular allegiance was to the Father who was the only one to command his steps. These were not earthly state rules that he ever introduced; these were the matters unbound by earthly edicts; these were the matters of one’s heart and one’s heart alone.

Evidently, there were some incidences in which we might see a different angry Jesus, Jesus paying attention to burdensome Earth just as much as to the lofty skies, Jesus who sought an establishment of earthly rules as much as those outside of immediate human condition. His fiery onslaught on the market stalls in the temple is sometimes cited as one of such instances. Since he physically chose to overturn the tables of the money changers then by extension he in fact was willing to impose his ironclad will on unacceptably lax norms of the society. All is very well, except for the very fact that this took place on the grounds of the Holy Temple. And this can never be ignored - “My house will be called a house of prayer, but you are making it a ‘den of robbers”

Just imagine Jesus verbally attacking a prostitute on some market corner anywhere else, admonishing her for peddling her sinful ways – impossible! Jesus of the Bible could not have done that save for the very temple itself. And this is very significant. Remember that Jesus came to lucidly demarcate the line of decision, as earthly rules would no longer be a conduit of God’s will. It was Jesus’ very own shed blood that was going to determine the eternal destiny of the human race. However all this would come to pass a little bit later. For now, he was still treading the planet and the temple was the very link that held God in touch with his people. But people grew callous and did not take heed. They prayed publicly but cursed privately; they washed their hands thoroughly but left their hearts un-bathed blithely; they padded their pockets contently and yet forgot the poor frequently. So far they strayed from God’s will that even the Holy Temple was no longer off-limits. The only solution was to rip apart this very connection and leave the people with no viable choice but Jesus. But before Roman legions could actually destroy the physical temple, Jesus himself had to take an authority over it by claiming it with his fury. They will go together - the Temple up in flames and Jesus up to eternal glory. This was final and irreversible. This was never about the state and was always about the faith.


Pauline Admonitions
All these arguments might be convincing enough but what if I am mistaken, and that after all Jesus was as much about our earthly arrangements as about our celestial well-being. The only way to test this in my estimation is to proceed further down the Cannon, assessing the very rules of such earthly entanglements. In the scripture apostle Paul seems to be the one to go by. And that’s where we should look. Paul of course was extremely prolific on just about any misconception and trap that could befall the church. Whether it had to do with church duties, customs or general tenors of behaviour, Paul was always there to admonish, correct and encourage. When it comes to the outside world save for actual evangelistic advice, Paul becomes significantly sparser - at first as if to appear unconcerned with the fate of unsaved and disobedient. It is not so, of course as he did find few occasions to state his position in terse abundance.

In the Letter to Corinthians 5-9:11 we hear “In the letter that I wrote you I told you not to associate with immoral people. Now did I mean pagans who are immoral or greedy or are thieves, or who worship idols? To avoid them you would have to get out of the world completely. What I meant was that you should not associate with a person who calls himself a believer but is immoral or greedy or worships idols or a slanderer or a drunkard or a thief. Don’t even sit down to eat with such a person”. Now what exactly is Paul telling us here? Many things really, but what is a truly inescapable is that the rules of engagement that Paul sets out for the church are definitely not the same as those applied to the rest of the world. On the basis of this statement it appears that confusing the notions of the church and the state (the world) is nearly impossible. The state cannot be the church and the state cannot be the church. By extension, the notion of Christian cannot be applied to both at the same time. The competing parties cannot possibly share the same name with completely harmonic equanimity.

And if still in doubt Paul follows this up with yet another unmistakable salvo - “After all, it is none of my business to judge outsiders. God will judge them. But should you not judge the members of your own fellowship? As the scripture says “Remove the evil person from your fellowship”. Adhering to Paul’s admonishing the once celebrated adulterer was driven from the fellowship and the lesson was forgotten by many who in the centuries to follow would continue seeking to reconcile irreconcilable – church and state.


Persisting with “Christian Nation”
Paul’s direct call for separate judgement on the issues of the church and the matters of the state is scintillatingly succinct and axiomatic. There is no further need to discuss and postulate; the two just do not mix. And yet many under the guise of the Bible bolted in the precisely opposite direction. Starting with Constantine and continuing with modern day politicians and clerics many affirm the false need to preserve our National Christian Principles. I cannot fault Constantine personally for his conversion to the sign of the cross or for his liberalization of the Christian church from the jaws of persecution. The former is a very personal spiritual matter and the latter is the extension of the godly morality that calls “free will” as the cornerstone principle of genuine conversion. What I do fault Constantine and his numerous successors for is the usurpation of the name of God for mostly carnal purposes of power and influence - precisely the wrong tack on the way to discovering God’s truth. This was the time when “Christian Nation” was born. Obviously not everyone agreed. But for times of tyrannical uniformity such voices were mostly silent.

However with modern plurality and liberation of speech the smouldering dispute caught on some real flames. This dispute goes to the very core of issues that we face on just about daily basis. One camp, with secularists and religionists alike, see the church and the state as an odd, uneasy pair. Another camp, made of just about exclusively of religionists, attempts to assert its influence on the state through claims of spiritual heritage. It is if attempting to say that there ever has been such a time when a truly godly state was in existence. Now being under siege this state requires all the help it can get and more. There is no place where this debate rages fiercer than in and about the United States of America.

This, founded on the very best principles of democracy, state is of course a very young sapling in terms of the world history. Diverse and ever-changing thanks to immigration and demographics, it has always struggled to find its singular identity. Being the foremost protector of speech, a definition of such identity hardly lands itself to any unique cause outside of the very fiat by which the country was founded in the first place – the Constitution. It is the only immovable aspect of the American lore that attempts to provide any degree of clarity as to why the place came into being in the first place. But since the Constitution values individual liberties and protections of speech as its cornerstones, it has never really stood in the way of societal evolution it has never been able to effectively stifle change, any change whatever it might mean. There are not ethical associations, religious tests or royal lineages that are protected by the fateful document. What really holds it together?


State Incarnate – A Mistake?
There are a thousand of answers to this question. One of the most popular explanations of the elusive adhesiveness is the belief in some special divine blessing that rests firmly above the blissful nation. The notion is certainly a very uniting and extremely uplifting one, providing much in a way of proverbial American swagger and aplomb. These of course vacillate with the ever-ebbing fortunes of the modern state – wars, crime waves and market crashes come and go and whenever there is too much of a good thing at any point of time, the talk of blessings and the lack thereof becomes pervasive.

Suddenly, the notion of a state transmogrifies in an individual who could be cursed, saved or blessed depending on his behaviour. It did of course happen during the God’s experiment with the church-state of Israel but could it still happening now? I would just personally turn to Paul. Alas, he gives us little in a way of support. Without it, I can only conclude that “Nation” cannot have personal attributes of salvation but rather it is a temporary concept that is essentially unrelated to the Godly purposes vis-à-vis the humankind. Again, if we take Jesus at his face value whatever stately god there is - on the state money, or on the state seal or in the shadows of the state flag, it cannot be possibly God of the Bible. Instead we are dealing with kind of a civic religion that seeks conversions in a purely one-dimensional, physical sense. Above, what commonality could there be between the civic religion acclaiming the virtues of democracy while the church inherently strives for something quite the opposite – theocracy?

“No, no” I hear the voices of the discontented, “That cannot be so, the Christian God of the Bible gave this nation (USA) to the faithful and now its enemies are taking it away. God help us!” OK, I will shut my eyes, close my ears and forget about Paul or at least what he had to say back in Corinthians. Let’s indulge ourselves in saying that the United States was founded as a Christian Nation under the God Almighty. Let’s assume that being such this nation could be treated as individual and not just any individual but a church member. And remembering Paul and Jesus just momentarily, let’s assess this new member as Jesus estimated Pharisees and Paul judged the immoral man in Corinth – by their deeds.

First of all, the inception or rather conversion itself as in the case of the United States they have to be one and the same. And being that the United States is the child of God it had to be have been founded and converted through a message delivered by Godly evangelists and apostles. Upon a cursory review nobody fits the profile better than the ever-ephemeral founding fathers. These legendary men must have been an equivalent of either Paul or Peter judging by their creation, they must have had an incontrovertible Godly character and bond that would have left precise and unmistakable Christian legacy. And here I hear “Houston we have a problem!” Not only the overwhelming majority of the founding fathers fail to produce incontrovertible Christian credentials but most of them left a totally different witness, the witness of Deism – a very popular Unitary view that while acknowledging the God Creator it left very little room for him to continue affecting his creation thus leaving the reason as the only viable etalon of human endeavours. Deism, while allowing for God to subsist, basically turned its back on anything supernatural including Jesus himself. And this is not all as Thomas Jefferson, as an example, frequently remarked on the evils of the organized religion (i.e. various Christian denominations), George Washington persistently eschewed Presbyterian communion and Benjamin Franklin attended Masonic lodges.

Jefferson actually went as far as writing Jefferson Bible that while extracting the best wisdoms of Jesus did not include his miracles or resurrection. George Washington repeatedly refused, in writing or otherwise, to acknowledge anything that had to do with his spiritual beliefs. Thomas Paine was actually decried by some Christians of the day as an atheist. This is a very colourful picture indeed, and if one adds the very Constitution itself, the document that utterly fails to mention God
[1] even once, into the mix, the account of the presumed conversion becomes exceedingly sketchy.

Now, the Declaration of Independence of 1776 did mention the word “God” or to be exact “nature’s God”. It also evokes Creator and universal morals, much in keeping with the discussion to follow in the next mini-chapter. There is obviously nothing to say that this was the God of the Bible, moreover given the deist beliefs of the founding fathers, “nature’s God” seem to fit quite well into the picture where Christianity does not play a role. And if in doubt read the following from so-called Treaty of Tripoli which was solemnly presented for ratification to the US Congress in 1796 by non other than John Adams “As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries”
[2]

What about the state affects? Well, the Pledge of Allegiance was written over hundred years after the birth of the state and thus cannot be considered a part of the founding lore. Besides, its original version did not contain any reference to God until changed by the US Congress in 1954 after the intensive lobbying effort, among others, undertaken by Knights of Columbus, a fraternal catholic association with involvement in masonry according to some. The fiery patriotism of the Civil War put “In God We Trust” on the Treasury coins and in 1957 the same was applied to the state paper currency. Again, despite the evocative in nature, “In God We Trust” is hardly surrounded by many Christian symbols while neighbouring on many a very cryptic, almost Masonic, one. So what can one deduce here? Not very much other than to say that these clearly played no part in the founding of the state and any associated Godly, specifically Christian, ties are muted at best.

Another, oft used, argument is that the American state must be “Christian State” since overwhelming majority of the citizens at the time of its funding were Christians. However, this does not seem to be the case either. Undoubtedly many came to the foreign shores in search of the religious freedom but they were likely in the minority as many original colonies were of purely economic nature such as Virginia Company. And if in much doubt, just consider the revolution itself which erupted and was primarily fought on the economics. Just recall the famed Boston Tea Party and “No taxation without representation”. And who did they have to separate from if not from the “Christian State” itself – Great Britain? Besides, according to some estimates the regular church attendance in the late 1700s in the United States was estimated by some to be significantly lower than that of Europe in the same time period. Go figure…

How about applying a test of deeds? It might work. Well, I do not think so, unless dropping a couple big ones on Japanese civilians or gratuitously assaulting numerous sovereign nations would qualify as righteous. “But this is now when the nation is corrupt and back-slid” say some. “Look into the incorruptible yonder of the past!” Sure except that I am frequently tempted to quote the Ecclesiastes 7:10 “Do not say “Why were the good old days better than these?” For it is not wise to ask such questions”.

Alright let’s give some people slack and look. Oh, where are those Indians that used to live here and now no more; and why they are fields full of slaves who obtained such favourable conditions at a point of a gun sanctioned by the very state we are testing? Not convenient, I see. How come there is so much vice, green and corruption? Why do the rich live leisurely off “trusty
[3]” wealth while poor fish for scraps in the gutter? Why did you burn Salem “witches” on the basis of hearsay? Are you not the newly converted son of God? Where are the deeds of your newly found faith?

Of course the imaginary questioning above is utterly ridiculous as the notion that a state could be blessed, cursed, saved or damned. People in it – yes, the state itself no, IT IS NOT A PERSON. Alas, the exceeding economic prosperity and might of the American state has made it difficult to refute the preposterous. When arguing the obvious with the proponents of the state-personhood complex I cannot help but marvel at their inconsistencies since the United States came into upper reaches of the prosperity orbit precisely at the time when is falling from Godly grace into damnation and immorality, and not at the time of its pure innocence of a new convert. And if this is not enough what do we say about the prosperity of the ungodly ranging from the cosily hedonistic European socialism and the freshly polluted skies of the heathen China, on to the oily Satanic riches of Saudi Arabia and the Emirates. Undoubtedly, the notion of statehood personified in the view of God is most likely utter nonsense. And if this is the case, than the pining of some for the elusive “Christian Nation” is in vain.

Now does it mean we should take the state out of the church altogether? Of course, not as Paul commanded us praying for our rulers. However, he specifically said to pray for peace that emanate from such rulers and not for their conversion. Did Paul not care about the salvation of the rulers? Surely he did and he said so quite profoundly in Acts, however, “praying for the rulers” is likely meant “rulers” as a general notion, as those representing the state. And since not the state but the people in it can be converted, the best hope that we have from the state is peace and freedom to practise our beliefs.


Ungodly Morals?
This was a truly remarkable gathering spot. It could hardly be used for any public meetings as the very centre of it was beset by an unkempt garden that once in a while was restored to some surprising momentary glories by lackadaisical state gardeners when bothered to take a break from their smoking intermissions to do some pruning, planting and weeding. As for meetings private it was hardly conducive either as heavy traffic swarmed all around suffocating anyone looking for a moment of private silence and contemplation. And as to make the surroundings utterly unbearable the city planners had managed to lace the place with irresistible attractions. As a result, humanity kept bouncing between numerous governmental offices nearby, traversing between ballet and dramatics of two theatres facing the square and if that was not enough fighting with bright-shouldered hordes of steely shoppers scourging about in search of rare state offerings.

And yet some folk still used the unlikely location for very, very private meetings. The place was the square in front of Moscow’s Bolshoy Theatre and the calendar was set somewhere in the 1970s. The Soviet Union was just about to outlive its demoralized self and the people that gathered here were “Golubiye” or “Blue”, a zippy sobriquet for homosexuals in Russian. The homosexuality was illegal in the workers cradle as the party leaders preferred much uniformity in all matters including very personal ones. After all it was just easier to govern that way. Harassed and ridiculed, the alternate lifestyle community vainly searched various ways to remain inconspicuous. One of the busiest thoroughfares of the state seemed to provide a good cover and if asked pretending to be in some theatre or department store line-up was a good one. The deficits in the workers state were galore and queues aplenty – a perfect cover.

Then or now, such state of affairs would be unthinkable in the United States or anywhere else in the western world. And yet when measured to the strictest Biblical standards such heavy-handed attention to sin would be anything but immoral, at least to the liking of many pining for “Christian Nation”. But how is it possible that an avowedly atheistic state with its ideological core solely rooted in the doctrines of materialism had such a law? Honestly I do not know exactly. But whatever the reasons, it goes on to show that states are just amoral beings that from time to time happen to match biblical morality. And this is no surprise since everyone, regardless of religion or lack thereof, has morals that come from God.

Just consider Letter to Romans 1:18 “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities – his eternal power and divine nature – have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse”. You see all men were endowed with basic understanding of God and his morals, not only Christian men but all men. Obviously all men did not follow God by not giving either thanks or glory. And yet at the same time some unwise and mostly ungodly men such as many a Greek philosopher or a Roman policy maker recognized from time immemorial certain, more convenient, pieces of the puzzle that could contribute to betterment of their version of social order. Therefore it is not surprising that just about any society that manages to function for any significant length of time employs very similar moral structures in their laws.

If one thinks that he can steal or kill with impunity in Islamic Iran, or Buddhist Nepal or atheistic China is likely to be disappointed upon finding of facts. And this is not all of course as for example abortion is currently illegal in Iran as it was in the Soviet Union. Their expressed reasons differed but their results were similar. And yet in the United States the abortion is not only legal following the Roe vs. Wade of 1973, but was also legal for the better part of the first hundred years of the country’s existence. And if you in doubt regarding my logical twists on the matter of morality and how it is available to all human kind, please consider perusing some timeless musings of the venerable C.S. Lewis in his “Mere Christianity”.

Now, let us proceed further down the passage quoting the Letter to Romans 1:21:23 “For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles”. Very interesting piece since it, at the first glance it refutes my previous argument, making it impossible to claim wisdom and yet be at odds with the Almighty. But do not give up yet. Besides, could there be such a thing as two different wisdoms – the worldly wisdom and Godly wisdom. One wisdom is incompatible with the rejection of God and the other is not – emphasising once again that the purely material matters of the world is not what concerns Paul in this passage. In fact, had it been otherwise could we be witnessing today such magnificent technologically and so deficient spiritually structures such as Egyptian pyramids, Burmese Buddhist temples and New York skyscrapers. Hardly! Could we be sending utterly baffling and complex chunks of metal into the open vistas of cosmos with the live being in them and then actually getting them back safe, most of the time? Inconceivable! Yes, men could be extremely sagacious and yet extremely foolish all at the same time. Yes, it is possible that men in their earthly wisdom used some of the godly tools and yet coming short of the truth itself. Yes, God’ creation is dual, it is material and spiritual, it is ungrateful and pious, both at the same time.

And if still in doubt consider ploughing further down the Letter to Romans 1:24:25 “Therefore God gave them over in their sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than Creator – who is forever praised. Amen!” I say “Bingo!” God gave them over to their shameful desires and he is not asking us to drag them back in any but a spiritual sense”. Can the spirituality be overridden with laws of the state?

The answer is the resounding “NO” the laws of the state are ineffective of changing the spiritual condition. Just look back at the any time when avowedly Christian states were presiding over the world affairs. Whether the absolutist France under the very Catholic Luis XIV or England under the very Protestant Elisabeth I, the world has been wallowing in misery, wretchedness and senseless wars. And if the current nominal state of affairs is any indication then the last time I checked, the Lutheran country of Denmark with God plastered all over its state symbols and Church irretrievably edged into its Constitution is viewed by many as an utter pit of hedonism. Where does it leave the United States with its Masonic currency symbols and no mention of God in the Constitution?

A very interesting question considering that according to some, apostate Europeans are no match for pious Americans in the God’s department. Clearly, there is not a single shred of correlation between the stately usages of God’s names while ascribing them to worldly power and actual political, social or religious outcomes. Remember “Give Caesar what is Caesar’s…” give the governments freedom to act in their collective realm and leave the spiritual realm to its own devices of the individual free will. Alas, we got it the other way around with our spiritual leaders continually striving to enter the political arena while advocating ever-diminishing governmental influence over the matters of the increasingly individualistic “dog-eat-dog” world of modern economics and social order. The latter statement is a very interesting policy making argument and perhaps should be pursued in a separate discussion. For now why do not we attend to the church and the state some more?


Swinging to the Extremes
And here comes the tasty bit. What are we, as Christians, supposed to do in this world? What our involvement should really be? How do we influence those around us? Or do we pursue influencing anyone at all? And so on and so forth. This is an extremely legitimate and ever-current discussion, isn’t it? But sometimes we tend to jump into is without considering some of the underlying positions such as our relationship to the state in which we live. That’s why I have sought to bring some clarity into the state-church discussion - the conversation that has been necessary before delving further into some practical applications.

Before considering some historical examples (little repetition, sorry), it is suffice to remind everyone about the Letter to Corinthians 5-9:11. I personally find the Pauline advice to be the most viable impartation of Godly wisdom in the matter. I.e. do not disengage from the world and yet do not judge the world but judge those inside the fellowship. Now, about the history. In the early going it was obviously very tough when Christians were persecuted, whipped and martyred with harrowing regularity. And yet they did not withdraw from society, spreading God’s word and message of salvation. The results were astounding as the small unknown sect was becoming ever more influential and present in the public discourse. It was dangerous and yet inspiring to so many who sought to effect the change from within the heart.

All this of course changed when Emperor Constantine, perhaps acting on some very constructive instincts, set forth the motion by which the world came to be dominated, judged and reshaped by the church - much to the contrary to Paul’s advice. The results were of course less than desirable. Then came the advanced philosophies of enlightenment and politics and industrialization pushing the church from the centre stage. Many at this time, especially in the Protestant circles, swiftly retreated more or less completely from the public arena. Only a small number remained with the likes of William Wilberforce labouring in the public eye.

An overwhelming number of evangelicals, specifically North American evangelicals, waiting for an immediate coming of the Messiah avoided the state as much as it was logistically possible on other hand. The pendulum had swung from one extreme into the next and many Christian found themselves in contravention to the Paul’s good advice once again. The more secular the society around them became the deeper into isolation they dug.

By the 1960’s they had enough – winds of drugs, sex and rock-n-roll blew in too uncomfortably for many and unexpectedly for just about all. Many understood that society found itself in the midst of an incredible soul-searching exercise. And just to add few spoonfuls into the mix: the questionable wars in Indochina, sky high oil prices at the pump and Roe vs. Wade - the challenges to the prevailing cocooned Christian position of then become apparent. And yet we blew once again with some of our leaders jumping on the pendulum and swinging where it has not been for a couple of centuries. Now, once again, we wanted to dominate, judge and reshape.

The state was to be re-made by an active show of political unified force through such movements and organizations as Silent Majority and Christian Coalition. Perhaps very positive and constructive undertakings in their core, these went way beyond the Pauline advice and very quickly at that. Suddenly, we were seeking re-establishment of the “Christian Nation”, the impossible notion. We conscripted historians, writers and theologians to re-make the failed argument once again. We no longer sought conversion through personal free will; we sought domination through edicts and laws. We had much initial success and converts, imbuing on the sweet fragrant potion of power. We finally could reshape legislatures and install presidents. All this was truly amazing stuff and here was the pitfall.

You see, the formula turns out to be rather simple as nothing feeds power better than certainty. Nothing nourishes certainty better than one-dimensional propaganda and nothing creates better propaganda than a five (four or three is even better) point program. Forget about the nuances and impartiality, this stuff is for the weak and indecisive. Let’s form power blocks instead; and be as influential and decisive as possible.

Certain key types in the movement and their outside friends smelled the opportunity miles away. Savvy political operators saw an incredibly easy opportunity to seize a substantial chunk of electorate with incredible dare. Of course, this has never been about taking over the party but rather the other way around, as it has always been. And remembering propaganda does not like complexity the whole movement was stripped off many of its essential elements, soon emerging re-made in the Republican Party image. The church leaders, inebriated with newly found importance, never let on the deception by essentially sticking to a three-point agenda: gay rights, abortion and laisser-faire capitalism. The Republican Party never really cared about the first two and was only too happy to pull the throttle into highest gear on the third. Happy to surrender the pontificating tribune on the gay rights, they took the country, unchecked by ever tilting and docile electorate, into the land of many extremes. Human rights, equality (of opportunity at least) and societal economic well-being were thrown out of the window. Helping the poor or healthcare for the middle classes was no longer hip. And the church stood by not only unconcerned but smiling along the way.

They could drive their three pony carriage as far as they wanted in the newly recast “Christian Nation”. The healing and encouraging Christ of the masses was no longer on the agenda, on the church agenda as the state had never cared in the first place. No, now the Christ was wearing armour, carried a sword and ardently fought infidels. He passionately hated abortionists, loved flashy televangelists and longed to send all gays to the gallows. To claim the agency of the new “christ” in charge of the nation we needed to be constantly on the look-out for the attack from the ungodly. The churches become increasingly mobilized – more so in the political realm. We wrote petitions and held placards, were quick to condemn and slow to self-assess. The line between the state and the church has gradually become so blurry that some of our leaders have seen it fit to call for assassinations of foreign leaders and to condemn entire countries to perdition. Sometimes we have become so deluded as even to misunderstand that we were simply used. The turning point arrived at the time of fateful 1980 presidential elections when the evangelicals were persuaded to support religiously nebulous Ronald Reagan against an avowedly Christian Jimmy Carter. Mr. Reagan of course pandered to the illusion of “Christian State” while Carter clearly treated the state not as an extension of the church. This was his main failing in the eyes of many caught up in partisanship while ignoring his historic peace seeking efforts in the Middle East (Camp David Accord) and vis-à-vis the Soviets (anti-ballistic treaty). Pity…

To follow, the first fruit of our new political order, Mr. Reagan, busted the unions and opened the flood of cheap labour across the southern border; made deals with the oily Satan and sent the proceeds to enflame Central America; denuded the middle class and sent jobs to China. The results, followed by his able successors including pliable Mr. Clinton, did wait to materialize. The country now struggles with economic powerlessness, corporations post ever-increasing profits, the middle class can longer afford a physician and still nuke-less Iran poses the biggest threat to the world’s security.

So what about the church? By and large there is hardly anything new to report from the evangelical ranks. What is worse is that instead of taking a pause to ponder, we have gotten dragged right into so called Culture Wars. To advance this agenda most effectively our handlers seek persuade us that that we live in the “Christian Nation” in the first place and that this nation (i.e. this individual Christian) needs our urgently help as it is going to Hell in the hand basket. To make matters more apparent some portray certain cultural and political shifts as example of inexorable progression downward. It is not always easy of course and requires some considerable amnesia mixed with partial facts. Forget the habitual orgies of the Roman Empire, religious slaughter of the Middle Ages or massive drug use of 1960s. Do not consider that countries where abortion is illegal (should be a subject of a separate discussion) typically have higher abortion rates than those where it is more or less legal, or that favourable gay legislations have failed to produce any more gays (yet another discussion). Disregard all this and close yours eyes, very tight and it is scary out there and we are all going down. Down we may be going but unlikely for the reason that it is worse now than it has ever been. If in doubt just recall Ecclesiastes.

Surely nothing could be more futile than Culture Wars and yet it is pervasive. Mounting yet another defence of the Christian Nation we search for Islamo-Fascists, chase the illegals and bash the gays. Please understand that I am not calling for performance of homosexual rites or Islamic prayers in the church. This of course is contrary to the Bible, and yet following Paul’s advice, I find it hard to sit judgement on those outside as it is God’s prerogative. Besides when armed with a banner depicting Mohammed in the flames of Hell I do not look very approachable to my newly arrived neighbours from Pakistan, do I?


Listening to Jesus

Whatever our beliefs regarding the end of the world, the timing of the tribulation or rupture, one thing is absolutely unmistakable – “Christian State” was never going to a be a reality. The closer we move to the end of times worse Christians are going to be treated by the world. Gospel of Mathew 24-9 reads “Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, you will be hated by all nations because of me”. Regardless of your timing beliefs, the general state of the relationship between Christian and the state is ultimately expected to significantly deteriorate. If Jesus said that it will happen why do we fight for something quite the opposite – “Christian State”?

So what role does the church play in the modern world? This is for this specific question that I mentioned William Wilberforce, a British parliamentarian of the 19th century who fought and prevailed in the struggle to abolish slave trade in the British Empire. Aside from being a Member of Parliament, Wilberforce was also a dedicated Christian who, acting out of his spiritual convictions, righted the cruel injustices of the slave trade. The lucrative and repugnant practice that was contrary to just about any set of morals, let alone the teachings of Christ. Wilberforce did not fight this issue on the basis of a platform of compromises but as a singular evil waiting to be excoriated and purged. Although a private supporter of Tories did not seek a particular party platform or positions of influence other than to advance his singular cause that he deemed righteous. He succeeded - the slave trade in the Empire was abolished and his contribution is still celebrated as a great achievement that had brought glory to Christ.

We do not know when the end will come and that the only true Christian State will follow the second coming in the meanwhile we have work to do. So instead of wasting our efforts on preserving “Christian State” let’s spread the word of salvation through visible, proud and Godly actions or justice and mercy in front of the whole world.

In doing so we should not be claimed or conscripted by any political party and act on the basis of our conscience and free will. We should be involved with the state, unabashedly and openly as Christians, without being goaded onto any particular platform that demands conformity and compromise. We should be free to choose whatever issues are important to us individually and act however dictated by our conscience. Only in this way we can follow Pauline advice in the closest fashion possible. We should stop longing for the “Christian Nation” that has never been and bring about change from within.

[1] The word “Lord” is used for the dating of the document, however, this is argued to be a common practice shared by secularists and religionists alike.
[2] Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States and the Bay and Subjects if Tripoli of Barbary.
[3] Standard Oil, DuPont etc.